Please check out the thread:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/answer?qid=20130219204441AAtoGi5
Let me know you thoughts on my response:
I don't understand the question. Scientists use the Scientific Method. They may postulate an idea of what they
expect to find, but if the results are contrary, they will analyze and publish
those results. Real science is data
driven and thus more reliable than faith, which has no reasonable grounds of
proof. I am not an atheist in the sense
that I think there is no binding force in our universe (I do subscribe to the
idea, which scientist are beginning to build evidence for that there are many
other universes). At the heart of all
matter is energy, which has the capability to bind all of us in unison. Unfortunately, most people view themselves as
separate from God or what they may call God (in my case the basic energy of all
matter), and are not in unison. In the
unison of energy I guess I do have faith and don't rely so much on Science to
prove, although, since my belief is reliant on the natural laws of the
universe, both standard and quantum, it may be provable someday, unlike the existence
of an omniscient being. Please clarify
your question. It seems as though you
are doubting all scientist, which seems unfair, since science is what brought
us from the dark ages, which fundamental religious held in place for hundreds
of years, stunting human potential and growth.
